The peer review process of Asian Network for Scientific Information is focused to ensure that only good science is published. It is an objective process at the heart of good scholarly publishing.
Peer Review Policy

The Asian Network for Scientific Information while maintaining the highest standards of peer-reviewing, it increases the efficiency and the speed of the processes. Manuscripts submitted to the ANSInet are initially received by the editorial staff who may reject submissions that are out of the scope or that have low standard contents. Only potentially suitable manuscripts will be forwarded to the Editor-in-Chief to make the first decision. Editor-in-Chief will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request the Editorial Board to handle the manuscript. The Editorial Board members share their wisdom and vision with the Editors-in-Chief and assist him to make final publication decision.

Peer review of novel submissions:
Articles submitted directly to the ANSInet will be fully peer-reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board. The ANSInet reserve the right to assign additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when editors decide further review is required. Generally, all selected reviewers are asked to declare their competing interests, if any. Based on the referees comments, the Editor-in-Chief will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions for the submitted paper. Only the novelty and incrementally (but not assessments of priority) determine whether the submission would be accepted for publication in the ANSInet.

Frequently Asked Questions    |    Privacy Policy    |    Terms & Conditions    |    Contact Us